After several years of on-and-off again negotiation with Hobart Council, here is a draft plan for the Waterworks quarry site.

In order to see full scale simply click on the picture. Or you can download it onto your desktop (right click on the image).

The Council’s plans appear fairly minimalist and do not interfere with activities that have been mooted by various community members, but what do you think? Please click on ‘comments’ below if you would like to give feedback or if you would like to participate in any future planning for this community resource.

Or you can email Robert at 60.

We must thank everyone who has taken time to persuade Hobart Council to go ahead with the speed humps.

As you all know, Council finally made its decision to go ahead, but there is one last hurdle - the Department of Infrastructure (DIER) requires another round of public consultation.

To make is easier on everyone, we have drafted a collective submission on behalf of our community. Please have a look and let us know if you have any further additions or changes.

Here are the two relevant files:
speed hump submission
waterworks-crash-history

You can make any comments below or email Janine or Chris.

On Monday 14th, local residents Rob vincent, Chris Harries and myself attended a special meeting of the City Services Committee at the Town Hall. We each spoke for a few minutes to the alderman regarding our request for traffic calming in Waterworks Rd. Two residents from Ridgeway community and one Waterworks resident spoke against the proposal.

After some debate by the aldermen, the end result is:

- speed humps will be temporarily installed along the section of Waterworks Road from the reserve to Romilly Street for a six month trial period

- council will do a speed survey of the street prior to installation and at some stage afterwards to measure the effectiveness of the speed humps

- no plans were made to extend the installation of speed humps below Romilly street at this meeting, although these are still on the drawing board.

Only one alderman voted against the amended proposal. 

It seemed the aldermen were persuaded by the large response to their surveys and most importantly because there was such strong community support for traffic calming. 

Continue reading →